Media Consumption

Vaughn's Summaries logo

Internet Summaries

.
How To Surf Google News



The best way to avoid obnoxious ads which flash, is to entirely avoid web pages that use them.
When surfing Google news, some news sites blast your face off with flashing ads, while others have no ads at all. Since the big news stories appear on many sites, you may as well pick a site that does not scream flashing ads in your face.

Google, MSN and and Yahoo ads are fine, since they don't blast you senseless with unwanted screen motion. It is the ads from other ad companies that I am referring to.

How to Improve Google News - Google News Gaffes

NO ADS - The Best
Less Obnoxious Ads
Totally Obnoxious
Flashing Ads
Ads
Above
Fold
AFP (France)
Bloomberg (self ads)

ABC News

2
Aljazeera (Qatar)
CNET News (1 ad)

CBS News

3

Associated Press (US)
CNN (1 ad)

Chicago Tribune

2
BBC (England)
Guardian (self ads)

Christian Science Monitor

2
Press Association (UK)
MarketWatch (1 ad)

Denver Post

2
Voice of America (US)
Wall Street Journal (1 ad)

FOX News

2

Los Angeles Times

3

MSNBC

2

New York Daily News

2

New York Times, The

2

Reuters

2

San Jose Mercury News

3

Seattle Times

4

Telegraph.co.uk

2

UPI

2
Flashing Ads PLUS POPUPS

Boston Globe (plus popups)

2

Int. Herald Tribune (NYT) (plus popups)

2

San Francisco Chronicle (plus popups)

2

The Independent (plus popups)

2

USA Today (plus popups)

2

Washington Post (plus popups)

2

Worst of the Worst

Notes

Ads
Above
Fold

Forbes

Obnoxious "Welcome Screen" (full-page ad)

4

Information Week

The TechCareers ad NEVER stops flashing.

2

Newsday

The Classmates.com ad NEVER stops flashing.

3


Google News does one heck of a job, creating the news gathering algo. Creating a well-balanced display of news choices, as is listed at Top Google News Sites, must not be an easy thing to do. But, overall, I like the results I am getting. It looks pretty well spread out. One might question some of the characters that get in, but hey, that's part of diversity and free speech.

However, there is no reason to read the Washington Post (2 flashing ads plus popups), when you can read the same article at the BBC, with NO ads. I am prejudiced - I will always pick the British option - either the BBC, or the Guardian - two of the best, who actually allow you to read the text in peace, without RUDELY beating you senseless with visual distraction.

Online newspaper web site readership is sharply down. I can guess why. They all seem to think that annoying the heck out of you, is the best way to go. They are wrong. In their lust for the almighty buck, they ruin the entire news experience, and drive you away with infernal, devil-conceived distraction. Impolite, rude, and annoying motion.


Suggestions to Improve Google News
1. A news story is told on 450 news sites, and NOT ONE of them cites the specific, actual source (FDA). They all get the story from somewhere else, but cannot be bothered with telling you just what that source is.

2. Where is the editor? There are frequent misspellings and grammatical errors. Google leaves the content up to the providers, who aren't very good at what they do.

3. Photos
often do not represent what the news story is about, and are overly sensational. When you go to the link, the photo is not there. This is deceptive photo-baiting. This may result in a rapid loss of credibility for the site.

4. No standardization for headlines - First-word Caps (Standard Titling vs. Normal sentence), author punctuation (none vs. hyphen), etc.

5. About half of the articles include authors (Bloomberg, NYT, Washington Post), half do not.

6. About 1/10 provide location in the headline (AP, USA Today), about 90% do not.

7. Misleading links -
"ABC News" is really "ABC News Blog", as well as "ABC News"
"New York Times" is really "New York Times Blog", as well as "New York Times"
"San Francisco Chronicle" is really "San Francisco Chronicle Blog", etc.
"USA Today" is really "USA Today Blog", etc.
STOP LYING TO ME! And wasting my time.
On the other hand, "The Wall Street Journal Blogs" is listed as "Wall Street Journal Blogs". Kudos to WSJ.

(1) It Came From Where?
A prescription drug problem story, "FROM THE FDA", was recently found on 450 web news sites cited by Google news. However, I could not find the FDA reference. I searched the FDA high and low. I get 450 "colorations", but I am denied access to THE SOURCE? Online News sites should be required to reveal their ACTUAL source, not just some vague reference. Without traceability, so-called "news" is not to be believed. It is simply hearsay. An interpreted version of the original.


(1) "Could be meat, might be cake." . . . George Carlin
You must read several of the renditions, and compare them for details, hoping that the re-authors got it right. While some go for the truth, others who have personal agendas, go for propaganda. In a single news story, there can be two diametrically-opposed headlines, referring to the exact same story! Here is an example -

Home Defibrillators Are Good! and Bad?
"Home Defibrillators Do Not Increase Survival" . . . Reuters, and
"Home Defibrillators Save Lives in Study" . . . Associated Press


Well, which one is it? See what I mean? Spin it white, spin it black!
LET ME SEE THE SOURCE!


(2) NEW YORK TIMES CANNOT WRITE PROPERLY
What kind of editor does the NYT use?
The New York Times cannot use the correct verb -

New York Times cannot spell
A verb must agree with its subject in number - basic 8th grade English.
Shouldn't prestigious newspapers use grammar checkers to avoid the embarrassment of obvious errors, especially when they are incapable of getting it right??


(3) ANY PHOTO WILL DO
Sloppy, give-them-any-photo attitude -
What do shower curtains have to do with amalgam tooth fillings? -

Insider Medicine Is Clueless
I have seen MANY examples of this.


(4) ANY FORMAT HEADLINE WILL DO
Here are 3 news stories with properly Capitalized Titles -

Titles With Proper Caps

Here are 3 news stories with IMPROPERLY uncapitalized titles -
titles with no caps
Shouldn't Google, as a minimum, insist upon proper Title Letter Capitalization?
Or do people prefer the sloppy, "no standard" approach?



How To Surf The Internet - How to Watch TV




DISCLAIMER:
The opinions expressed above are solely those of the author.
Your views may differ.


top of page




Vaughn's Summaries (One-Page Summaries)
©2008 Vaughn Aubuchon ... All Rights Reserved
http://www.vaughns-1-pagers.com


This Vaughns How To Surf Google News Summary web page was updated on 2008-06-20.